Tiered review
Sampled, targeted and full review depending on risk.
Review, adjudication and continuous improvement
Human-in-the-Loop Quality Assurance
A structured review layer that catches errors before they reach training — and feeds back into the guidelines.
Quality as a Loop, Not a Gate
A final inspection at the end of a project finds problems too late to fix cheaply. Review has to run alongside production, feeding corrections back into guidelines and retraining while the work is still in flight.
What Is Included
Adjudication
Senior resolution of genuine disagreements.
Gold-set benchmarking
Continuous measurement against a held-out truth.
Error taxonomy
Mistakes are classified so the cause can be fixed.
Annotator coaching
Feedback goes to people, not just into a metric.
Guideline evolution
Repeated errors become clarified rules.
How We Work
- Separation of duties Nobody reviews their own work.
- Risk-weighted sampling Harder classes and newer annotators get looked at more.
- Root cause, not blame A recurring error usually means an ambiguous rule.
- Closed loop Every guideline change identifies the data it affects.
The Controls Behind It
- Agreement thresholds Batches below threshold are reworked, not delivered.
- Reviewer calibration Reviewers are themselves measured against gold sets.
- Trend reporting Quality over time, per class and per annotator.
- Rework tracking What was reworked and why is part of the record.
Ready When You Are
Tell us what you are building and we will come back with a plan, a sample and a price.